This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

general / Alternative Dispute Resolution

Brady v. Pitchess


Several state law enforcement agencies would like to inform prosecutors if officers have misconduct on their records, so prosecutors can seek and give to defendants any potential exculpatory evidence, as required by SCOTUS' 'Brady v. Maryland.' But does that violate California's 'Pitchess' laws, saying personnel files can only be opened in response to court orders?

Attorneys who brought and who argued the case before the state high court Wednesday - Geoffrey Sheldon (Liebert Cassidy Whitmore), Judy Posner (Benedon & Serlin) and Elizabeth Gibbons (The Gibbons Firm) - offer competing views.


Related Tests for Alternative dispute resolution

general/Alternative Dispute Resolution

Women Leadership in Law

general/Alternative Dispute Resolution

SCOTUS DIG Deepens Uncertainty over Shareholder Suits

general/Alternative Dispute Resolution

The Possibility of Non-Partisan Maps?

general/Alternative Dispute Resolution

A Tentative Proposal

general/Alternative Dispute Resolution

When speed surveys are necessary

By Jason A. Clay

general/Alternative Dispute Resolution

What you need to know about mediation confidentiality

By Lars C. Johnson