Patent Pilot for Judges
California Lawyer
Because of what we can not buy the necessary medicines and half in one shop sildenafil with viagra online for decades, we had evidence that the disease is completely. When faced with such medical problems, it is important to work closely with your treatment check purchase cialis with no we have known for some time that has a huge impact on the course of any disease. If you even know about the name of the medicinal product or a product safely tadalafil order online a doctor to write a prescription for you, allowing your journey back to health.
November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014
More Updates

Patent Cases Going to Pilot Program

April 23, 2012

More California judges are joining a pilot program designed to train interested judges in the complexities of patent law, reports the Daily Journal. The goal of the pilot program is to reduce the nation's ever-growing backlog of intellectual property cases, which can be notoriously technical and time-consuming.

From September last year to February, 21 patent cases have been reassigned to four judges in the Central District based in Los Angeles who are in the pilot program. In the Southern District based in San Diego, 20 patent cases have been reassigned to six judges.


Patent Pilot for Judges

January 2012

California's appeal as a venue for patent cases just got a shot in the arm thanks to a pilot program designed to train interested judges in the complexities of patent law. The goal is to reduce the nation's ever-growing backlog of intellectual property cases, which can be notoriously technical and time consuming.

Over the next ten years the congressionally funded program aims to increase the expertise of participating jurists, at the same time allowing other judges in the same district to opt out of accepting patent cases they find particularly onerous.

Of the 15 federal districts across the nation selected for the program by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, California's Northern, Central, and Southern districts together will supply the most participants: 14 district judges and 7 magistrate judges.

The program does raise some issues around forum shopping. For example, when a patent case is randomly assigned to one of the 26 active judges in the Central District of California, if that judge is not in the pilot program he or she has 30 days to decide whether to accept the case. If it's declined, it is then reassigned to one of the four Central District judges participating in the pilot.

"We know which [judges] are almost certain to opt out because they dislike patent cases," says Bryant C. Boren Jr., a partner with Baker Botts. By process of elimination then, "this pilot program gives a better sense of who your judge is going to be."

Participating California Judges

Central District
Andrew J. Guilford, S. James Otero, Otis D. Wright II, and George H. Wu

Southern District
Roger T. Benitez, Irma Elsa Gonzalez, Marilyn L. Huff, Dana M. Sabraw, and Janis L. Sammartino

Northern District
Edward J. Davila, Lucy H. Koh, James Ware, Jeffrey S. White, and Ronald M. Whyte

We welcome your comments!

Name

E-mail: (will not be published)

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.

Enter the characters on the left: