Editor's Note
California Lawyer
Any medication as you desired from the warehouse and the order will be delivered promptly to the specified address see buying cheap viagra online take into account the specifics of a particular pharmacy and the presence of specific sales tools. Any medicine of high quality and at an affordable cost online pharmacies cialis resource these solutions help customers easily navigate and pleasant shopping. It is necessary to use the quick search box that is on every page how to buy cialis resource courier rang beforehand to agree a convenient delivery time and arrived at the agreed time.
November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014

June 2013

Back in 2008, international consultant Richard Susskind published a book that was bound to give a lot of law firm lawyers the jitters. It was called The End of Lawyers: Rethinking the Nature of Legal Services.

"[F]irms are being called upon to reduce their fees, to undertake work on a fixed fee rather than an hourly billing basis, and to be far more transparent in their dealings with clients," Susskind wrote. "Also, they are coming to be selected, more than occasionally, on the advice of hard-nosed, incoming procurement specialists in client organizations rather than by old friends and colleagues. The legal market," he added, "looks set to be a buyer's market for the foreseeable future."

Of course, the economy is doing much better now than it was five years ago. And for all the talk about the demise of the billable hour, major American law firms continue to treat it as a central organizing principle. But concerns about the future have hardly evaporated, and apocalyptic books on the subject keep getting published. Recent titles include The American Legal Profession in Crisis and The Lawyer Bubble: A Profession in Crisis.

What, then, must big firms do to survive and thrive in the years ahead? Four managing partners tackle that question for this month's cover story ("The Future of Big Law"). In one essay, Dan Grunfeld of Kaye Scholer talks about what big firms need to do to compete more effectively against boutiques. In another, Laura Shelby offers insights on what her firm, Seyfarth Shaw, has done to control costs. Jay Rains of DLA Piper writes about the challenges of going global. And Molly Moriarty Lane of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius makes the case for reinventing career tracks.

Also in this issue Bill Blum writes about attorney John D. Barnett, a trial lawyer who has made his mark by defending police officers accused of on-the-job misconduct ("Projecting Doubt"). (Barnett's most recent high-profile case involves an Orange County cop who was charged with second-degree murder after he was caught on camera, along with several other officers, beating a homeless man.)

"Barnett loves to try cases," Blum observes. But unlike many lawyers who do this kind of work, Barnett himself is not an ex-cop. He also describes himself as a liberal Democrat.

Finally, it is my pleasant duty to report that California Lawyer has won three Maggie awards from the Western Publishing Association for articles that we published in 2012. The Maggie for best news story went to Pamela A. MacLean for her piece on the bankruptcy of Stockton "Sleepless in Stockton," (December 2012). In the best feature category, Victor Merina won top honors for his write-up on the state's patchy record of compensating factually innocent defendants for the years they've spent behind bars "(Adding Insult to Injury," November 2012). And Stan Sinberg took the best profile award for his story about Marty Singer, a Los Angeles attorney who, on behalf of his celebrity clients, makes unflattering news stories disappear "(The Muck Stops Here," July 2012). Congratulations to all.

We welcome your comments!

Name

E-mail: (will not be published)

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.

Enter the characters on the left: